Temporal Processing
Derivation of the psychophysical impulse response through generation of ultrabrief responses. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A9, 1025-1040, 1992.
Psychophysical derivation of the impulse response through generation of ultrabrief responses: Complex inverse estimation without minimum phase assumptions. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A7, 1025-1040, 1992.Analysis of flicker sensitivity and its variability in the visuogram test for normal observers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 32, 2552-2560, 1991.
Some tacit assumptions in visual psychophysics. In, Representations of Vision. Gorea A. (Ed.), University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1991, pp. 251-278. (Evidence for a hard threshold limiting flicker detection.) PDFInvariance of temporal sensitivity with nicotine, alcohol and progesterone intake. Clin. Vis. Sci. 6, 323-330, 1991.
Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity. IV. Validity of the Ferry-Porter Law. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A7, 743-758, 1990 (with R.D. Hamer). PDF
Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity. III. Meridional variations in peripheral flicker sensitivity. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A4, 1612-1619, 1987. PDF
New look at Bloch's law for contrast. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A3, 52-61, 1986 (with A. Gorea).Interlacing eliminates CRT perceptible flicker. Information Display 2, 14-18, 1986. PDF
Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity. II. Peripheral retina and the role of photoreceptor dimensions. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A2, 393-398, 1985. PDF
High temporal frequency visual evoked potentials to luminance and pattern stimulation in the peripheral retina. In Proc. Int. Evoked Potentials Symposium. Barber C. (Ed.), MTP Press: Lancaster, pp. 199-204, 1980. (with P.A. Apkarian).
Analysis of visual modulation sensitivity: Two components in flicker perception. Vision Res. 15, 843-848, 1975.