Export 692 results:
Shanidze, N., & Verghese, P.. (2019). Motion Perception in Central Field Loss: Visual Field Contributions. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ARVO: Vancouver B.C.
López-Moliner, J., Vullings, C., Madelain, L., & van Beers, R. J.. (2019). Prediction and final temporal errors are used for trial-to-trial motor corrections. Scientific Reports, 9(19230), 1-15.
Kim, A. S. N., Wong-Kee-You, A. M. B., Wiseheart, M., & Rosenbaum, R. S.. (2019). The spacing effect stands up to big data. Behavioral Research Methods. 10.3758/s13428-018-1184-7
Ezeana, M., Dacus, C., Whitney, D., Teng, S., & Puri, A.. (2019). The spatial resolution of object discrimination across echolocation and touch. Object Perception, Visual Attention, and Visual Memory (OPAM).
Teng, S., Sommer, V., Cichy, R., Pantazis, D., & Oliva, A.. (2018). Auditory letter-name processing elicits crossmodal representations in blind listeners. In Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience.
Heinen, S. J., Badler, J. B., & Watamaniuk, S. N. J.. (2018). Choosing a foveal goal recruits the saccadic system during smooth pursuit. Journal Of Neurophysiology , 120(2), 489-496. 10.1152/jn.00418.2017
Vullings, C., & Madelain, L.. (2018). Classical conditioning of saccadic latencies using gap and overlap paradigms. Vision Sciences Society. St. Pete Beach, USA: St. Pete Beach, USA.
Vullings, C., & Madelain, L.. (2018). Control of saccadic latency in a dynamic environment: allocation of saccades in time follows the matching law. Journal Of Neurophysiology, 119, 413-421.