Publications

Vullings, C., & Madelain, L.. (2017). Control of saccadic latencies in a concurrent interval reinforcement schedule. Association for Behavior Analysis International. Paris, France: Paris, France.

Vullings, C., & Madelain, L.. (2017). Contextual control of saccadic reaction times using a latency-contingent paradigm. European Conference on Visual Perception. Berlin, Germany: Berlin, Germany.

Vullings, C., & Madelain, L.. (2015). Choice and saccadic latency in a concurrent random interval reinforcement program. Forum annuel du Groupement De Recherche Vision. Grenoble, France: Grenoble, France.

Vullings, C., Harwood, M. R., & Madelain, L.. (2017). Reinforcement can reduce the size- latency phenomenon. Forum annuel du Groupement De Recherche Vision. Lille, France: Lille, France.

Vullings, C., & Madelain, L.. (2017). Discriminative control of saccadic reaction times using a latency-contingent visual search task. Society of Quantitative Analysis of Behavior. Denver, USA: Denver, USA.

Vullings, C., Harwood, M. R., & Madelain, L.. (2019). Reinforcement reduces the size–latency phenomenon: A cost– benefit evaluation of saccade triggering. Journal Of Vision, 19(16), 1-9. http://doi.org/doi.org/10.1167/19.4.16

Vullings, C. (2018). Saccadic latencies depend on functional relations with the environment. (Advisor: L. Madelain)Psychology. University of Lille.

Walker, L., Verghese, P., & Coughlan, J.. (2005). Modeling eye movements in a shape discrimination task. Journal Of Vision, 5, 921–921.

Walker, L., & Malik, J.. (2004). When is scene identification just texture recognition?. Vision Research, 44, 2301–2311.

Walker, L., & Ma-Wyatt, A.. (2011). Recalibration of eye and hand reference frames in age-related macular degeneration. Journal Of Vision, 11, 954–954.

Walker, L., Verghese, P., & Fletcher, D. C.. (2007). Efficienct Eye Movements for Low Vision Rehabilitation. Journal Of Vision, 7, 98–98.

Walker, L., Verghese, P., & Coughlan, J.. (2007). Where to look next? Eye movements reduce local uncertainty. Journal Of Vision, 7, 6.

Walker, L., & Harms, R.. (2011). Saccadic targeting depends on both the pre-cue and task. In PERCEPTION. PION LTD 207 BRONDESBURY PARK, LONDON NW2 5JN, ENGLAND.

Walker, L., & Malik, J.. (2004). Sequential information maximization can explain eye movements in an object learning task. Journal Of Vision, 4, 744–744.

Walker, L., Dang, L., Verghese, P., & Fletcher, D. C.. (2008). Effect of central scotoma on eye movement behavior. Journal Of Vision, 8, 641–641.

Walker, L., Coughlan, J., Verghese, P., & Malik, J.. (2005). An information maximization model of eye movements. Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems, 17, 1121-8.

Walker, L., & Verghese, P.. (2007). Orientation discrimination in the periphery depends on the context. Journal Of Vision, 7, 585–585.

Walker, L., Verghese, P., & Coughlan, J.. (2006). Eye movements incorporate knowledge of part structure. Journal Of Vision, 6, 482–482.

Walker, L. (2009). Uncertainty reduction as a theory for fixation selection. Journal Of Vision, 9, 11–11.

Wang, H. -cheng, Katzschmann, R. K., Teng, S., Araki, B., Giarré, L., & Rus, D.. (2017). Enabling independent navigation for visually impaired people through a wearable vision-based feedback system. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 6533–6540).

Watamaniuk, S. N. J., & Heinen, S. J.. (2003). Perceptual and oculomotor evidence of limitations on processing accelerating motion. Journal Of Vision, 3, 698-709.

Watamaniuk, S. N. J., & Heinen, S. J.. (1999). Human smooth pursuit direction discrimination. Vision Research, 39, 59–70.

Watamaniuk, S. N. J., Bal, J., & Heinen, S. J.. (2017). A Subconscious Interaction between Fixation and Anticipatory Pursuit. Journal Of Neuroscience, 37(47), 11424-11430. http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2186-17.2017

Watamaniuk, S. N. J., & Heinen, S. J.. (2007). Storage of an oculomotor motion aftereffect. Vision Research, 47, 466–473.

Watamaniuk, S. N. J., & Heinen, S. J.. (2015). Allocation of attention during pursuit of large objects is no different than during fixation. Journal Of Vision, 15, 9–9.